Sunday, April 23, 2023

Warning: Do Not Use Canada Post's Xpresspost Service

 


On March 7, 2023, I sent a wedding present of $500 using Canada Post's Xpresspost. It cost $17.00 to mail for tracking and a two-day delivery expectation. Within 13 hours, it had vanished at the Calgary facility.

In a phone call with the Claims department, I was initially told I would be reimbursed according to how much insurance I’d bought. However, when the envelope was purchased, insurance was not offered (or even mentioned) as an option. 

Almost a month and a half later, the envelope has never turned up. I’ve since been informed that CP does not actually cover anything that someone would use Xpresspost to send. Their email advised me to reply if I had any questions, but when tried to do so, my email was returned as "rejected" by the recipient. I have since sent two more emails which have had no response. 

My questions are:

1/What is the explanation for my envelope disappearing? What does CP think happened to it?

2/How extensive has the investigation been and how long with it continue to be investigated?

3/What percentage of Xpresspost items actually do go missing? Are these envelopes being           scanned for valuables and deliberately targeted for theft? (I am inclined to think so..)

4/Is there such a thing as a dead letter department for Xpresspost where my envelope may be sitting for some reason? Has that even been checked?

In their email, CP apologized for any “inconvenience” they may have caused. Well, I’m afraid that losing $500, is considerably more than an inconvenience! I placed my trust in CP and when I paid 17 times the price of a regular letter, it was with the understanding that my envelope would be securely tracked and delivered as described. 

CANADA POST lost this on their watch! How can they possibly not be accountable? Their insurance should be covering the loss. And, if CP is not held accountable, what incentive is there for these losses to ever be taken seriously and properly investigated? 

My advice: Do not trust or use Canada Post Xpresspost!

 




Sunday, March 5, 2023

MLA Drew Barnes disrespects and embarrasses Albertans again!

 

Drew Barnes, ousted UCP MLA now sitting as an independent, has once again disrespected and embarrassed Albertans, this time by inviting right-wing extremist and convoy organizer Tamara Lich to stand and be acknowledged in the Alberta Legislature on February 28th before the budget was tabled.

A true leader within the freedom movement. She gave hope to all of Alberta, Canada and the world. She was proud to stand strong and free in face of the worst government overreach in a generation”, he announced.

Lich is presently charged with mischief, obstructing police, counselling to obstruct police, counselling intimidation and intimidation by blocking and obstructing one or more highways, along with breaching bail conditions in connection to the occupation of Ottawa in 2022. She is also known for her association with the Yellow Vest and Wexit movements as well as the separatist Maverick Party and support of the anti-Muslim Clarion Project.




More recently, Tamara Lich (right) is seen above in a photo op with German Member of the EU-Parliament – Alternative for Germany, Christine Anderson (left) and lawyer for convoy organizers, Keith Wilson (center). Christine Anderson and the AfD party hold extremist anti-Islamic, anti-immigration and German nationalist views. AfD party rhetoric has been described as ‘Nazi-like’ and ‘tinged with Nazi over-tones’.

And in this photo, Tamara Lich poses with anti-Islamic podcaster Tom Quiggin.

This is not the first time that Drew Barnes has disrespected Albertans. In February 2021, he joined a national coalition against lockdowns claiming Albertans had not been given adequate evidence to justify public health regulations, even though 1900 Albertans had already died from COVID-19 at that time and hospitals were operating in a crisis mode.

Asking for Tamara Lich to be acknowledged in the legislature is an outrage. The occupation of Ottawa had nothing to do with freedom. As citizens can attest, it was not ‘peaceful protest’ and Tamara and her cronies were nothing but bullies of the first order. But to have overlooked her racist affiliations is either very poor judgment on Drew Barnes’ part, or perhaps something worse. Either way, her introduction in the legislature was a total disgrace to most Albertans.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/freedom-convoy-tamara-lich-arrested-1.6503718.

 https://www.antihate.ca/the_freedom_convoy_is_nothing_but_a_vehicle_for_the_far_right 

Monday, September 19, 2022

Princess Elizabeth's Royal Visit to Calgary, October 1951


These are photos of the Royal Visit to Calgary taken by my father, Arnold Roberton in 1951. At that time, Elizabeth was still Princess Elizabeth and was visiting as the representative of her father, King George VI, who was unwell.                                 

Arrival at the C.P.R. Station in Calgary

Princess Elizabeth and Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh with Lieutenant Governor John J. Bowlen and below with Calgary Mayor Don Mackay outside City Hall.


In the motorcade.



 

A Reflection on Labour Day


 As Labour Day rolled out this year (2022), my thoughts were with the countless number of employees who were placed at risk every single day in my province (Alberta) during the COVID-19 pandemic because employers refused to comply with or enforce mask mandates. Even worse, when these employers were reported to the Alberta government, as they were time and time again, the government did nothing about it.

My question is: In cases where employees became seriously ill, developed long-COVID or even died from work-related COVID, what is the liability of employers who knowingly and deliberately ignored public health mandates? When I posed this question to the Alberta Occupation Health and Safety Board, the representative I spoke to would not even discuss the matter with me as I was just a ‘member of the public’ and not specifically an employee or and employee. 

Throughout the mandates, I often asked employees if they had the right to refuse to serve someone who was not wearing a mask. Most said ‘they didn’t know’, which suggested the subject had never even been discussed with them. I also asked managers and HR reps the same question, and for the most part they said ‘yes’, so why didn’t the employees know that? However, when I asked one manager in Extra Foods, a division of Loblaws, she informed me that they had actually been instructed by “head office” not to enforce the mask mandate. Subsequently, I wrote two letters (one in January 2022 and another in March 2022) to Loblaws corporate headquarters in Canada asking for clarification, but to date, have received no reply.

The photo above shows signage on the door of one business in Central Alberta, taken on September 12, 2021 while mask mandates in public places were in effect. Curiously enough, the business appears to have no problem complying with another public health mandate which prohibits pets from entering the store –  much more serious, apparently, than protecting staff and customers against a potentially deadly virus.


Thursday, February 10, 2022

Freedom Convoy? NOT!

 

What is currently happening in Ottawa, and other Canadian locations has nothing to do with freedom. It’s about a mob that has been ramped up through social media by extremist right-wing organizations that some of the participants probably have never even heard of. It’s a melee that appeals to the same people who have been abusing retailers, threatening health-care workers and stalking elected officials in their own communities for two years now because somewhere along the line, they have come to believe that the law does not apply to them.

They have already exercised their freedom to not be vaccinated, but now, they now think they should be able to control the way the rest of the world reacts to that choice. Even if Canadian restrictions were removed tomorrow, Canadian truckers could still not enter the US without being vaccinated!

The ‘protest’ part was over by the second day. It’s now an occupation. The citizens of Ottawa are totally blameless, yet this ‘freedom-loving’ mob sees nothing wrong with holding city residents hostage and impinging on their rights to a far greater extent than has ever been imposed through public health regulations. And ironically, in terms of the supply chain, ongoing occupations at Canada/US border have been much more harmful to everyone than a small number of unvaccinated truckers ever would have been.

An obscene amount of money is being thrown at this. When GoFundMe wisely disassociated itself from this fiasco, organizers were quick to hook up with GiveSendGo, purportedly a ‘Christian’ site. Since the site has also raised funds for Kyle Rittenhouse and US Capitol rioters, the ‘Convoy’ certainly appears to meet the criteria. But, do individual truckers really think they are going to benefit from the money that’s presently being amassed? My guess is that a good portion of it will be tied up in litigation for years, because organizers will certainly be sued. Canadian authorities will also be following the money to determine what percentage of it might be ‘threat financing’ from outside Canada. And because organizers are, by and large, part of other organizations with their own agendas, I think there will be a feeding frenzy where the money is concerned, starting with the lawyers.

To see who is really behind the occupation, please see:

https://www.antihate.ca/the_freedom_convoy_is_nothing_but_a_vehicle_for_the_far_right

https://pressprogress.ca/meet-the-extremists-and-social-media-influencers-at-the-centre-of-the-far-right-siege-of-ottawa/

With freedom comes social responsibility, not irresponsibility. It’s not about ego, self-interest and bullying people. The really sad part is that the whole thing is such a colossal waste! A waste of time, resources and money, all of which could be used for so many other worthwhile efforts.

For another excellent perspective, please see:

https://projectprotech.ca/community-news/whose-freedom-is-the-freedom-convoy-fighting-for-not-everyones/

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Worst Premier Ever Alberta 2021


The United Conservative Party in Alberta has been selling hats as a fundraiser that read:  Best Summer Ever, Alberta 2021".

Given what a disaster the summer has actually been, with out-of-control COVID cases, plans to stop testing and mandatory isolation and almost no input or guidance from government officials, I thought this image was much more appropriate. 

December 2022 update: On October 11, 2022, we became saddled with Danielle Smith as interim premier. When I originally posted this in July, 2021, it didn't seem possible that we could have ever have a worse premier than Jason Kenney. Unfortunately, I was wrong!

May 2023 update: For more in-depth information about the Kenney government, please see:

 https://thetyee.ca/News/2023/05/17/Bully-Haunting-Alberta-Election/


 

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Won't Ship to a Box Number

 Although hundreds of thousands of rural Canadians have a box number address, those of us living in the country are continually refused proper service by companies and individuals who, for their own arbitrary reasons, have decided they won’t ship to a box number. 

One go-round has been with Staples, who advertise free shipping on their website. However, when you actually try to place an order, you discover that Shipping addresses must have a Canada Post verified street address’If you contact Customer Service, you quickly find it is next to impossible to get the agents to grasp that most farms and acreages out in the country don’t have street addresses.

Some of the excuses I routinely get for not mailing to a box number are:

·         The on-line shipping form is not set up for box numbers

·         Item requires a signature

·         Item is too large to fit in a post box

·         Item isn’t being shipped by Canada Post

·         Street address is required for door-step delivery

·         Box numbers are not secure

·         Box numbers are suspicious. People have them for nefarious purposes

In most cases, Customer Service agents (email or telephone) are responding from a prepared script and clearly have no understanding about rural mail delivery. Therefore, in September 2020, I decided to address my concerns with Staples in a written letter to their head office in Ontario. To date, (now July 2021), despite two letters to Customer Service and three more to CEO David Boone, I still have had no reply whatsoever.

In fact, rural mail delivery is much more secure than parcels left on a porch in the city. If a Canada Post parcel does not fit into a rural mail compartment or requires a signature, you get a delivery notice and go to the local post office/agent with identification to collect it. If the item has not been shipped Canada Post, it will go to the appropriate courier depot in the community for pick-up. These include Fed Ex, Purolator, UPS and DHL. You are notified either by the local depot phoning you directly or by an email from the shipper tracking the item. No, the item will not be delivered directly to your door out in the country, but that doesn't mean you can't receive it.

Refusing to provide service to a specific group (rural Canadians in this case) is, by definition, discrimination. I feel any company doing business in Canada should legally be required to deliver to all Canadians at their legitimate address.

That Staples' head office has not responded to five letters speaks volumes as to how the company values our business. They seem to have overlooked the fact that it is many of the people with those pesky box numbers who are actually putting food on their tables!

Inevitably, customer service agents will tell you to "just use a different address". However, as a rural Canadian, my box number is my only mailing address. It is also the address that is on my driver's license, income tax, bank statements etc. I don't have another address and I shouldn't need one!

Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Albertans Against the Common Good

This is a shot from a public Facebook posting from the Whistle Stop Cafe in Mirror, Alberta March 8, 2021. It refers to the Alberta hairdresser (niece of former premier Ralph Klein) who decided she knew a lot more about COVID-19 than the medical or scientific community. On January 12, 2021, in the middle of the pandemic, she defied public health orders by opening her salon anyway. Instead of getting fined and shut down, the UCP government suddenly announced that 'personal care services' could now legally re-open the following week. This emboldened several other maverick businesses to do the same thing, including the Whistle Stop Cafe, whose owner, in the meantime, appears to be devoting more time crusading against the imagined loss of freedoms than actually minding his own business.




Then along came two Alberta UCP MLAs, Drew Barnes and Angela Pitt, who, in order to further their own agendas, joined a national coalition against lockdowns claiming "Albertans have not been given adequate evidence to justify the rules......:https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/end-the-lockdown-coalition-1.5908105

As of February 2, 2023, 5486 Albertans have died from COVID -19. (When I originally wrote this in March, 2021, the number of deaths was 1900, so to date, an additional 3586 people have lost their lives.) I'd say the family and friends of those who have died, along with the front-line medical personnel who have witnessed those deaths on a daily basis probably believe that they've had more than enough 'evidence' to justify the rules. Political grandstanding from self-absorbed ego-driven business owners and ambitious politicians dishonors every single one of those people who have died and completely disrespects the families. It is also a slap in the face to all the conscientious Albertans who have made sacrifices of their own in order to help bring down the curve.

Right now, we're in a race against the variants. In all likelihood, lockdowns will be necessary again. Obeying those regulations should not be optional.

December 2022 update: As of October 11, 2022, Alberta has been saddled with Danielle Smith, a science-denying interim premier who believes that those individuals who refused to comply with public health regulations and routinely endangered others are 'the most discriminated group she has witnessed in her lifetime'. In November, she announced regulatory changes banning both school mask mandates and a move to on-line learning, even though Alberta is being slammed by a 'tri-demic' of COVID-19, RSV and flu. There is a soaring absentee rate in Alberta schools and the Alberta and Stollery Children's Hospitals are at or over 100% capacity. The Alberta Children's Hospital has placed a heated trailer outside the emergency department in order to deal with surges in patient volume, yet our so-called premier continues to push her ludicrous agenda with little concern for children, teachers, support staff or parents.

Friday, October 30, 2020

Trump on the importance of keeping jobs in the US


Less than a week before the 2020 American election, I heard Donald Trump once again ranting on about the great importance of keeping jobs in the US. "Joe Biden's outsourcing your jobs", he warns.

And I wonder.. Does he mean jobs in the textile and clothing industry? The funny thing is - it isn't Joe Biden's name on this shirt!





Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Toilet People

Toilet People

 Created by my friend in Switzerland during the 2020
 Covid-19 pandemic



















Thursday, January 2, 2020

Tattoo Shop Sign


A friend from Switzerland sent me this photo, adding that it is probably lucky the shop is not located in a predominately English-speaking location!

Friday, November 2, 2018

The Bargain Store, Mission, BC

Store entrance with pet crates featured in the window


There are very few real second-hand stores left. I mean the old-style owner-run second-hand stores that used to be in nearly every community.  Stores run by the original recyclers, long before second-hand shopping became trendy & chic. And long before the large corporate “thrift” stores came into play, trying to gentrify the business and dominate the market.

Luckily though, one such store still remains. By far the best one I have found in many years is the Bargain Store, located in Mission, BC. It is owned and operated by Heather McCormick who has run the shop for 31 years and unfailingly manages to have the most incredible selection of goods on offer at any given time.

Heather buys and sells. Pretty much everything in the store is something she has bought for re-sale. Yet her prices continue to remain more reasonable than many stores that actually get their goods by donation. The Bargain Store is not in a shopping mall! It’s in the same place it’s always been, down on Railway Avenue - a location that has worked well for Heather and her customers for 31 years.

To me, it’s what second-hand shopping is supposed to be.  Thanks to Heather’s great eye, there is always a good collection of antiques and vintage as well as an unending selection of furniture and overall useful items. The Bargain Store is also well known for having the best selection of pet crates in the Lower Mainland.

So kudos to Heather (who just turned 80 in 2018) for all her hard work in keeping this truly authentic and wonderful second-hand store running for all these years! Your customers appreciate you more than you know!

(Update: In the spring of 2019, Heather retired from the store, passing on the name and location to new owners. As one of my friends said, "Eighty-one is probably not too soon to retire". Nevertheless, we miss you Heather!)






Heather (center) with two of her customers

Heather's famous old van

Friday, April 6, 2018

More Roberton Family History (9)


While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)
The Robertouns (cont.)



According to Lodge, “This lady is the youngest daughter of the late Sir Francis Burdett, Baronet of Foremark, Co. Derby, and Ramsbury, Wilts (many years M.P. for Westminster), who was born 25th January, 1770, and died 23 January, 1884, having married 5th August, 1799, Sophia, youngest daughter of the late Thomas Coutts, Esq., banker, of London. She was born 25th April, 1814; assumed by royal license the additional surname and arms of Coutts, under the will of her grandfather’s widow, Harriet, in 1837; and was created Baroness Burdett-Coutts of Highgate and Brookfield, Middlesex, in 1871.”

But to return from this digression.  John Gray of Auchingraymount married Jean Robertoun, second daughter of Lord Bedlay.  This John was probably a son of Professor Rae, who married on of the daughters of Archibald of Stonehall.  Their daughter, Mary Rae, was married to Robert Hamilton of Fairholm, “wrytar and Town-Clerk of Hamilton, and wrytar to His Grace the Duke of Hamilton.

Another cadet of the family was John Robertoun, Sheriff-Clerk of Lanarkshire, and brother of Bartholomew, laird of Earnock.  He married Elizabeth, daughter of John Hamilton of Fairholm, and their eldest daughter, Margaret, married 5th September, 1706, her cousin, John Hamilton of Fairholm, writer in Hamilton, and bailie of the regality and dukedom of Hamilton.  Another daughter, Elizabeth, was married to William Cullen of Sauchs, and was mother of the celebrated physician Dr. William Cullen, as is shown by the following extract from “The Register of Births and Baptisms of the Parish of Hamilton”: - “William Cullen of Sauchs, writer and Town-Clerk of Hamilton, and Elizabeth Robertoun, his lawful married wife, had their second son brought forth on Saturday morning, about 6 of the clock, 5th of April, 1710, and baptised William on Tuesday forenoon, the 2nd of May, 1710, in the Kirk of Hamilton, by Mr. Alexander Findlator, collegiate minister of Hamilton.  The witness, John Robertoun, Sheriff-Clerk, and John Hamilton of Fairhom.”

Another branch of the family, engaged in mercantile pursuits in Glasgow, retained that part of the estate called Kennedies up to a recent period, when it was sold to the present proprietor, Mr. John Dunn.

This ancient and honourable family is now extinct in the district. “Their memory and their name is gone.” Still, for the antiquary and the genealogist there is a melancholy pleasure in tracing their pedigree, and musing over the changes which the vicissitudes of time and the reverses of fortune have brought about in connection with their history.

This concludes the 1874 writing.  Although lengthy and written in an old and somewhat cumbersome style that can be difficult to follow, I feel it is well worth posting to for the benefit of other Robertons who are interested in their family history.




Wednesday, November 1, 2017

More Roberton Family History (8)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)


The Robertouns (cont.)

Archibald’s son, James, first of the House of Bedlay, was an advocate, and became on of the Senators of the College of Justice, under the title of Lord Bedlay.  He was Commissary of Glasgow in 1625.  The name of Archibald, son of James Robertoun of Bedlay, occurs in the Commissary Records in 1653. Elizabeth, eldest daughter of James Robertoun, advocate of Bedlay, married James, eldest son and heir of John Dunlop of Garnkirk, who was a member of the Faculty of Procurators.  The marriage took place on the 5th April, 1654.  From them the Dunlops of Garnkirk and Tollcross are lineally descended; and what is not a little curious, the celebrated family of Coutts, the wealthy bankers of Edinburgh and London, are also descendants of James Dunlop and Elizabeth Robertoun, through their eldest daughter. This lady married, first, Robert Campbell of North Woodside, near Glasgow, who died in 1694, leaving an only daughter, who succeeded to his property, and became the wife of Thomas Haliburton of Dryburgh Abbey, and Newmains, Berwickshire.  Robert Campbell’s relict, in the third year of her widowhood, married a second time Patrick Coutts, from Montrose, then a “merchant burgess of Edinburgh.” She had several children to Mr. Coutts, the eldest of whom, John, was Provost of Edinburgh in 1742.  The Provost had four sons, who were the founders of the celebrated banking houses of Coutts & Co., in Edinburgh and London.  James and Thomas, the two youngest sons, originated the banking establishment in London.  On the death of James, in 1778, Thomas succeeded as sole manager; and becoming banker to George III and many of the principal aristocracy, with habits of great economy, he soon acquired an immense fortune.  By his first wife, Susan Starkie, who had been his brother’s servant, he had three daughters – Susan, married to the Earl of Guilford; Frances, married to the Marquis of Bute; and Sophia, married to Sir Francis Burdett, by whom she had Sir Robert Burdett, sixth baronet, and Angela Georgina Burdett-Coutts, who was created a baroness in 1871.  Thomas died in 1822, and the greater part of his wealth came to be inherited by his grand-daughter.  Thus the eldest daughter of James Dunlop and Elizabeth Robertoun, was grandmother of Thomas Coutts, the millionaire and banker of London, and the munificent Baroness Burdett-Coutts is her great-great-grand-daughter.


More Roberton Family History (7)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.
Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)


The Robertouns (cont.)

The amorial bearings of the Robertouns of Earnock were quarterly – 1st and 4th, gules, a close helmet, argent; 2nd and 3rd, a cross crosslet, fitchee, gules; crest, an anchor, proper. Motto – “For Security.”  These arms, quartered with the three cinquefoils of the Hamiltons of Neilsland, of which family Captain Gilchrist was the representative, are sculptured on a stone above the front door of the office-houses of Eddlewood, now occupied as a farmstead by Mr. James Marshall.  The coat is considerably defaced, and the motto illegible; but the name of the Captain’s lady, “ANNA ROBERTOUN,” above the arms, is distinct and legible.

We subjoin a few particulars regarding some of the minor branches of the family, and, first, of Archibald of Stainhall, third son of John Robertoun, ninth laird of Earnock, and his wife, Margaret, daughter of James Hamilton of Torrance. In 1595, a remission was granted “To Sir Jno. Hamilton of Letterick, knight, and to several of his servants, to Quintin Hamilton of Auchingraymount , Archibald Robertoun of Stainhall, and Jno. Dalzell, for burning part of the house of Jno. Hamilton, tailor in Hamilton, in the month of April last; and also for the slaughter of the late Patrick Hamilton, brother of laird of Preston, and the late Mr. Gavin Hamilton, Provost of Hamilton, at the same time.”

Patrick Hamilton, one of the individuals for whose slaughter this remission was granted, was the youngest son of Sir David Hamilton of Rossaven and Preston, and captain of the island of Arran.  “His career of violence and oppression,” says Anderson, “has been hardly equalled even in the fictions of romance.  Outlawed for the slaughter of James Inglis, tutor of Murdieston, and of David Stewart of Bute, he tooks refuge in the Isle of Arran in 1582.  He was again denounced for carrying off and retaining in captivity Thomas Inglis, the young laird of Murdieston, his brother’s ward (1594), and soon after met a tardy retribution of his crimes, being slain in an encounter by Sir Jno. Hamilton of Letterick, in the town of Hamilton, 2nd April 1595.”

Archibald Robertoun married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Ballie of Jervieston, by whom he had James, founder of the House of Bedlay, in the parish of Cadder. He had also several daughters, one of whom, Margaret, was married to John Rae, also a professor in Glasgow College, and had issue.

Sunday, May 7, 2017

More Roberton Family History (6)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)

The Robertouns (cont.)

16. Major John Robertoun of Earnock married Elizabeth, eldest daughter of James Hamilton of Dalziel (by Margaret, his wife, daughter of Sir Archibald Hamilton of Rosehall), by whom he had a son James, and three daughters – Anna, Marion and Violet.

 Anna married Captain James Gilchrist, R.N., of Annsfield, whose mother was Grizel, only daughter heiress of Patrick Hamilton of Neilsland.  They had issue – two daughters, co-heiresses – Grizel, married to Mr. Boyes of Wellhall; and Anna, married 17th Oct., 1774, to Archibald, ninth Earl of Dundonald, and was mother of six sons, the eldest of whom was Thomas, tenth Earl – the celebrated Lord Dundonald, who was born at Eddlewood house, 14th December, 1775.  Another son was the Honourable William Erskine Cochrane, major in the 15th Dragoons, who served with distinction under Sir John Moore in Spain.  After retiring from the army, he lived for some time in Eddlewood House, and farmed Annsfield, which he inherited, but latterly sold it along with Earnockmuir to Mr. Dixon.

Marion, second daughter of Major John Robertoun, was married 12th January, 1759, to James Hamilton, of Aitkenhead, Cathcart, Renfrewshire, and had issue, two sons – James, heir and successor, and John , who went to India as a merchant. They also had four daughters – Elizabeth, Marion, Mary and Anne, the latter of whom married, in 1803, David Marshall of Neilsland.  This venerable and much-respected lady died at Neilsland House on the 17th of February, 1865, in the ninety-sixth year of her age.

The estate of Earnock was sold by the Robertouns towards the end of the last century to a Mr. Semple, who resold it, about 1810, to A. Millar, Esq., who died without issue, and was succeeded by his sister, Mrs. Williams, who sold it to John Watson, Esq. Of Neilsland, reserving, however, a life-rent of the mansion-house.

Saturday, April 29, 2017

More Roberton Family History (5)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)


The Robertouns (cont.)

12. This Bartholomew succeeded as twelfth Laird of Earnock.  On the 17th October, 1608, with the consent of his father, he was contracted in marriage to Margaret, lawful daughter of John Law of Waterfoot, Mearns.  She was sister to Mr. Andrew Law, minister of Neilston, grandfather to John Law of Lauriston, who was Governor-General of the Finances in France, and who made such a prominent figure in Europe as a financier.  By Margaret Law he had issue,

13. John Robertoun of Earnock, his successor, who married Christian, eldest daughter of Sir John Hamilton of Orbieston, one of the Senators of the College of Justice, and Lord Justice Clerk.  Sir John appears to have acquired part of the lands of Provan, near Glasgow, for his daughter Agnes, along with her sister Christian (Lady Earnock) had a charter under the great seal of an annual rent furth of the lands of Provan, 24th July, 1567.  John Robertoun had issue by his wife Christian Hamilton – John, his successor; and Anne, married to James, son and heir of Robert Chancellor of Shieldhill.

14. John Robertoun of Earnock married Bethia, daughter of Sir John Henderson, first Bart. Of Fordell, in Fifeshire, by whom he had a son, John, his heir, and a daughter Christian, who married Archibald Robertoun of Bedlay.

15. John Robertoun, next of the family, married Anne, only daughter of William Hamilton of Raploch, by whom he had John, his successor, and William, a fine young gentleman of great merit and virtue, who died, unmarried, to the grief and regret of all who knew him.

Thursday, March 9, 2017

More Roberton Family History (4)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)


The Robertouns (cont.)

7. This Robert of Earnock married Margaret, daughter of John Hamilton of Torrance, by whom he had

8. John, his son and heir, who succeeded his father, and married Elizabeth, daughter of Alexander Cleland of that ilk, an ancient family in Lanarkshire, whose mother was of Lord Sommerville.  He married, secondly, Margaret, daughter of Allan Lord Cathcart by Helen his wife, daughter of William Lord Semple, and had issue John, his eldest son and heir, and Roberto, who went abroad and settled in France.

9. John Robertoun, next in succession of this family, married Margaret, daughter of James Hamilton of Torrance, by who he had James, his heir and successor; John, whose descendants succeeded to the estate; and Archibald of Stainhall, who married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Baillie of Jervieston, by whom he had James Robertoun, who became of the the Senators of the College of Justice, and first of the family of Bedlay, in the parish of Cadder.  Archibald had also several daughters. One married the Rev. David Dickson, of whom was descended the Dicksons of Carberry. John Robertoun of Earnock had also several daughters, of whom Abigail was married to Mr. David Forsyth of Hallhill, commissary of Glasgow;  and Margaret or Janet, to Robert Hamilton of Little Earnock, whose second son, James, was  founder of the Bangour  family in Linlithgowshire.

10. James Robertoun, next of the house of Earnock, married Christian, daughter of John Dundas of Newliston,  and widow of Rober Dalzell of that ilk. By her he had James, who succeeded,  and a daughter, Isabella, married, in 1567, to Gavin Hamilton of Airdrie, another married to Blair of Braxfield, and a third to Muirhead of Lynbank, of who was lineally  descended  Mr. John Muirhead, minister of Cambusnethan,  and William his brother. This James Robertoun was a partisan of Queen Mary, and, in 1572, he was indicted, along with fifty other gentlemen, as being accessory to the murder of Darnley, and the regents Murray and Lennox. In 1579, he became a cautioner, to the extent of £1000 Scots, for the appearance of James Hamilton of Bothwellhaugh before the King and Lords of Council. He appears to have had some connections with the Hospital of St. Nicholas, in Glasgow, founded by Bishop Muirhead,  and was possession of the original charter of foundation, as is shown by the following minute of Presbytery:  - “June 1, 1586. – It is ordained that the Laird of Earnock be summoned to produce the foundation of the Almshouse of Glasgow, given to him by Sir John Moyne, if he have it to this day.”

11. James Robertoun succeeded his father, and married Alison, third daughter of George Hamilton of Rossaven and Preston, by who he had a numerous issue of sons – John, Matthew, James, George and Andrew. Several of these went abroad,  and served under the Marquis of Hamilton in his expedition to Germany in 1631, in the service of the renowned  Gustavus Adolphus, King of Sweden,  against the Imperialists. Matthew, the second brother, inclining to settle abroad, obtained from the marquis a certificate of his birth and family, which was drawn up in the form of a birth-brief certifiying the said Matthew to be a younger son of James Robertoun of Earnock.  John Robertoun (by corruption called Robtoun in France) was his grandson, and was a councillor in the Parliament of Paris. He left behind him a son, John, who was secretary to His Majesty George I, when Elector of Hanover.  He died in 1731, and left a son, George Robertoun, who was his heir.

In the commissary records of Glasgow, James Robertoun, Laird of Earnock, appears as cautioner in the testament of James Baillie of Jervieston, and Ellison Hamilton, Lady Earnock, occurs in February 1620, and in November, 1624.  From James, eleventh of the house of Earnock, the estate appears to have passed to the heirs of John, second son of John Robertoun, ninth representative of the family, whose wife, Margaret, was a daughter of James Hamilton of Torrance.

This John got an annuity out of the lands of Allirstocks, in the barony of Kilbride, from William Bannatyne of Corehouse, dated in 1586.  In the deed he is designed John Robertoun, brother-german to James of Earnock. It is taken to himself in life rent, and to Bartholomew, his eldest son, in fee, and to his heirs, which failing, to Robertoun, his second son.  John Robertoun married Christian, daughter of Robert Dalziel of that ilk, by who he had John, his eldest son, who died young and without succession , and Bartholomew, his heir and successor. For vouching the descent there is a precept of Clare Constat by Roberton Lord Semple: - “To Jas. Robertoun of Earnock, of the lands of Shawtoun, in the barony of Glassford, and to his lawful heirs, male; which failing to Jno., son and heir of Jno. Robertoun and his former wife Christian Dalziel, brother-german and sister-uterine of the said Jas. of Earnock; which failing to Bartholomew, their second son, and his heirs; which failing to the heirs whatever of their father, Jno. Robertoun; which failing to Archibald Robertoun of Stainhall, and his heirs, brother-german of the said Jas. and Jno. Robertoun.” This deed bears the date September, 1598.

John Robertoun, after the death of Christian  Dalziel, his first wife, married Margaret, sixth daughter of John Hamilton of Orbieston. The contract of marriage is dated at Blantyre Kirk, 16th May, 1594. Her brother, John of Orbieston, is her cautioner and witness to the contract.  John Robertoun had issue by his second wife – John, who was Sheriff-Clerk of Lanarkshire, of whom the Robertouns of Whistleberry, Kennedies, and others were descended;  and James, who also held the same office.  This James mortified a considerable sum of money for the poor of Hamilton, which is managed by the Town Council.  John Robertoun had also a daughter Anne, who was second wife of James Hamilton of Torrance.  She is described as “Sister of Bartholomew Robertoun, Sheriff-Clerk of Lanark, and afterwards Laird of Earnock.”

Friday, February 24, 2017

More Roberton Family History (3)

While looking for the author of The Robertons – A Noted Lanarkshire Family which appears in three previous posts (originally printed in the Hamilton Advertiser on August 7th, 1943), a librarian at the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Center also found another piece on Roberton history, again from the Hamilton Advertiser, but published in July 1874. Entitled Earnock and its Early Proprietors, it is another lengthy writing that I will present in a number of postings.

Earnock and its Early Proprietors (continued)
(from the Hamilton Advertiser, July 1874)


The Robertouns (cont.)

5. John de Robertoun, the first designed of Earnock, possessed the lands of Auchenback, in Renfrewshire, which he disponed to John Ross of Hawkhead.  The charter of alienation is confirmed by Robert II in 1380.  That which proves that this John Robertoun had a near alliance and relation by blood to the family of Earnock. “By John de Hamilton, Lord of Cadzow, to our dear kinsman (dilecto consanguineo suo), John de Roberton, son and heir of quondoam Symon de Roberton, of the lands of Earnock Sansay, lying in the barony of Cadzow and valley of Clyde, together with the land which is called Le Woolshaw, with its pertinent, to be held by the said John de Robertoun, and his legitimate heirs male, which failing, to Robert de Robertoun, brother of the said John de Robertoun.”  To this deed the granter, Sir John Hamilton of Cadzow, appends his seal: - “In presence of these witnesses, Robert of Dangleton, Jno. De Hamilton of Ingleton, Alex. Hamilton, Jno. De Hamilton of the Ross, and Alex. De Hamilton, Knights; William de Hamilton, Rotal de Weir, Simon de Nisbet, David de Hamilton, and John de Allanson, Esquires.” The charter has no precise date but from the names of some of the persons mentioned, and other concurring writs, it was probably about 1390-91. [“Le Woolshaw”, mentioned in the charter as having been granted along with Earnock is now called Wellhall, but where was “Sansay”? Was it what is now denominated Allanshaw, or was it the designation of the property granted? As there was a Meikle and Little Earnock, a Kennydie’s and Taits Earnock, perhaps this may have been Sansay’s Earnock, or Earnock-Sansay, as in the charter.] This John of Earnock, allied in marriage with the family of Sommerville, had a son, John, his heir, and a daughter, Isabella, who married Sir Walter Scott  of Murdiestoun, the direct and immediate ancestor of the Duke of Buccleuch, as is vouched by the original contract of marriage in the charter chest of the house of Cleland.

6. John Robertoun of Earnock succeeded his father, and married Margaret Hamilton, by whom her had issue a son, John, who was his father’s heir-apparent but died before him.  He left a son, Robert, who was served and retoured to his grandfather, of date 17th February, 1486.